Friday, March 24, 2017

Injustice in Justice

Hello World!

It is Frida Friday which means time for a new update on my blog. Thank you all for tuning back in, it's  much appreciated...

Wow. this week truly opened my eyes as to what the victims experience is truly like within the criminal justice system. Never before had I witnessed firsthand such questionable decisions made at the expense of potentially the general public, but more on that later... ( I want to dissect my week day by day if that makes any sense)

Wednesday (3/22/2017)



The day started with the typical victim-letter mailing and other administrative work which I have come to enjoy. Upon arriving though, I was notified that some sort of media crew would be coming later that day for some clips because the Victim Services had won some sort of award that will be awarded on April 3rd officially. I didn't think much of it since I didn't think I would be a part of the filming, but they wanted me to play the victim for a quick clip. Let me just say I don't think that Hollywood is in my near future, but hey it was fun.

Once all of that was over, I had to recount over 2000 ribbons for Victim's Rights Week because the inmates at Perryville Prison apparently aren't that great at counting (at least those who had to count/make the ribbons, then again there were 2000 and I too had trouble). It was hard, but you gotta do what you gotta do as they say.

Thursday (3/23/2017)


On thursday I was hit with a dose of reality. As excited as I was to see what the parole hearings are like, never did I imagine the intensity involved with each hearing.

The first parole hearing involved many parties, the victims family, a different victim's letter, the inmate, the inmate's mother, and the Arizona Justice Project (and obviously the Board of Executive Clemency).  The inmate was sentenced 25 years to life (with a chance of parole) for murder in the first degree. At the young age of 17, the inmate and two other friends would attempt to hitchhike and then eventually would end up killing the driver. What is especially interesting is that this was not their first time doing this.
 In fact,  they had been suspected of doing this similar crime along the same highway in Texas, but there wasn't enough concrete evidence. Also, all of their supposed victims had been killed (and died) except for one who somehow survived being stabbed 13 times. (this was the victim that wrote the letter to the board). Personally, after hearing this backstory, along with hearing about his initial psych evaluation where he mentioned having killing thoughts, and lets not forgot the testimony from the murdered victim's parents, I wouldn't let him out.
Fortunately enough for him though, the Arizona Justice Project, a legal and support team made up of ASU law students whose goal is to help certain inmates pro-bono). The board seemed to be very intrigued by this group. To me it seemed that this made the board members want to let him out because he had this extensive "support system."
When the inmate had a chance to speak, his main  focus was to show how well he had done in prison, not receiving violations, taking many classes, teaching classes, etc. In the prison, he was an example to follow. If I am being honest, I do not feel that life in prison and life in the real world are comparable whatsoever. There is much more of a sense of freedom and leeway when one as out; life is more gray than clear cut, but in prison, it seems like the lines are more defined since one is under 24/7 supervision.
Back to the case. From my perspective, the inmate kept dismissing what he had done "he was young", and then would move directly back to showing all of his accomplishments, almost treating this hearing like a job interview which is pretty ironic since he taught job-interview classes which would only add to the irony since he had never had a real job being locked up at 17.
What really got to me was that this man at 40 some years old, mature enough to understand the severity of his actions, was not fazed at all, throughout the entire hearing he maintained a stoic demeanor showing no remorse, and continuously blaming his actions on others and his age. I don't know about any of you but as a 17 year old myself, my idea of hanging out with my friends does not involve hijacking cars and murdering their owners. There really is no justification for murder. especially if it was not accidental. I am a firm believer in second chances, however to me, there is a difference with wanting to change your life and not recognizing the severity of your actions.

Now obviously the board decided to release him, although I disagree,  I hope he will behave while on parole, and is on the road to changing his life...

Apart from this hearing, I also had the chance to observe another one that definitely had me feeling some type of way to say the least.

This next hearing involved a man who had accidentally murdered someone and was sentenced to 25 years to life for first degree murder even though it was accidental. This inmate had formally requested an official translator (which is in the realms of his rights as an inmate), and instead, the board did not provide any sort of translator they just asked the CO on duty to translate last minute because he was hispanic. Unfortunately, this led to poor translation at the expense of the inmate. Although this inmate had a plan once he'd be released, it was not adequately portrayed by the CO,  and the board was not fully aware on what the inmate's plans were. Also, this parole hearing kind of took the turn for the worst when the board members found out that he was an undocumented immigrant; things became a bit more political in my opinion. One board member went on a rant on how this inmate does not respect the law of the land because he had illegally crossed over 30+ years ago, it seemed as though she was more enraged by his legality as opposed to the actual crime at hand. Now this inmate already had an ICE detainer, and had expressed his desire to return to Mexico, so if I was the one who was so irritated by "his lack of respect for the country", I would have had him released so he'd then be deported so tax dollars wouldn't have been "wasted" on his care in prison. But I guess the board had different plans.

Anyways, this week has really opened my eyes to seeing the injustices that exist on both sides of the
 criminal justice system.

Thanks for reading.

-Frida

13 comments:

  1. Wow your week sounds like it was really thought-provoking. You have previously said that you are a big believer in giving second chances, but since you would not let this man into the free world after serving over 20 years in prison and showing exemplary behavior, I would assume that murder is an exception to this belief of yours. Also, you mentioned being particularly fazed at his lack of being fazed...since the crime happened over 20 years ago, don't you think he might have accepted what he has done and decided to move on with his life rather than decide to fixate on a mistake he made more than half his life ago?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Danielle! Thanks so much for your feedback! The first thing I want to addresss is that regardless of the crime or mistake a person has made, I do believe in second chances along with redemption... what was different about this particular inmate is that, from what I witnessed, he did not seem to comprehend the gravity of his actions and the impact his actions had on others... this was especially shown when he said "I can't apologize because it would be insincere"... and from that I gathered that maybe he needed more time to reflect because obviously he was on the right path, however, it just seemed that he lacked the maturity to truly understand that going on a highway killing spree (having many victims) with his friends can result in severe emotionally traumatizing damage for others in the community. Also, it could be that at the time of his conviction and when he committed such heinous crimes he was too young and immature to understand the complexity of the situation then and thus has continued to live in such perplexity.

      Delete
  2. Hi Frida! Sounds like this week was a very eye opening one. Personally, I find that case to be a very difficult one to settle. It is clear that the boy and his group of friends had some extreme issues at the time of the murder. Hopefully, his exemplary behavior in prison means that he got them sorted out. It is, however, very alarming that he showed little to no remorse about the crime he had committed. Still, a life sentence for something you did at the age of 17 seems quite extreme, and hopefully he has learned from his mistakes...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow Frida this had me on the edge of my seat. How did the man's previous murders come up in the parole if there wasn't evidence against him? Also, do you think that if the Arizona Justice Project was not supporting him that he would not have been granted parole?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Frida! I think it is really interesting to read about the interplay of the hearings you have been attending and your personal point of view on those matters. Keep these posts coming!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Frida! This week sounded like a very different, new experience. I agree with you - age is no justification for purposeful murder. However, why don't you think that the man's 'reform' in prison should have allowed him parole?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Frida!
    The parole hearings sound very interesting, especially about the ASU support group behind the man. Do you personally believe that the man shouldn't have gotten a second chance even though he's had more than 20 years to reflect his mistakes and at least showed some kind of good behavior?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Frida. If it was up to me, the man would not have gotten the parole. Luckily for the man, it is not. I have been really enjoying your blogs. Please continue the good work.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi Frida! Thursday's events were incredibly interesting to read. What did you do when you played the victim in the clip, and what other injustices have you seen during your project?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Rachel! I just stood there and accepted some packets, it wasn't that big of a deal. And yes I have seen the board not provide an adequate translator multiple times along with not informing Victim Services of the attendance of different victims to a certain hearing

      Delete
  9. I can't believe that you went through soooo many ribbons! And 13 times! That's literally the scariest thing I've heard of! I'm happy to see you are still passionate about your project!

    ReplyDelete